“The dating plan I followed was really helpful,” she tells me. “Because I realised I’d never dated before. My boyfriends at that point had all just been one-night stands that lasted.”
Learning what a healthy relationship looked and felt like, she discovered, required unlearning most of what she’d learnt about love. For millennia, love has been portrayed through the prism of unbearable passion, from the Roman poet Ovid, who declared “I can’t live with or without you”, to Richard Curtis’ rom-coms, we have been bombarded with the idea that love inflicts a certain type of lunacy. The idea that love is akin to entering a super-charged battlefield is baked into many of us.
“You think love is supposed to feel like suffering,” says deGuzman. “You see it in the movies and in books, that longing and that pining, that unattainable person in your fantasies. It [the love addiction] was all based on such unrealistic expectations.”
Yet while the pursuit of sex and love has dominated so much of deGuzman’s life, the question of whether you can be addicted to love as you might be to drugs or alcohol continues to divide the scientific community.
“Love addiction is a phenomenon that still isn’t recognised by any of the diagnostic manuals,” says Dr Daria J. Kuss, Associate Professor in Psychology at Nottingham Trent University.
“However,” she continues, while “the evidence base of love addiction is still in its infancy” and there is no consensus on the diagnostic criteria for love addiction, “on a neurological level it is very similar to substance addiction as it activates the same neurological mechanisms and areas in the brain that are activated when a substance addiction develops and is being maintained.”
The addiction to love and sex that deGuzman experienced were inseparable but they are “distinct, problematic behaviours,” says Dr Kuss. “For love addiction the focus will be on the partner addiction, spending time with the partner, being intimate with the partner. Whereas sex addiction is driven by the need to engage in sexual activity which is often more physical than cognitive.”