Women today have seen decades of feminist uprisings, enough to know that- while there have been many victories (the vote, the Equal Pay and Sex Discrimination Act) much has remained the same. The recent incident with Creasy shows how square-peg-round-hole our power structures still are, with not only scant considerations for women, but an actual lack of space for them in a framework built by and for men.
‘We’re losing these moments that have historically shown the power of constructive rage like the marches of the 1960s and the suffragettes,’ says Radojevic.
Brief pockets of energy – like the Women’s March in 2017, when 100,000 protested the election of Trump – have dwindled, and numbers at the subsequent Women’s Marches were greatly reduced, even before the pandemic. ‘You don’t see anything working, life is getting harder and more expensive, and rage takes energy,’ Radojevic continues. ‘How can you have that energy if you're a mom of two, working 24/7 and being crippled by childcare costs? And let’s not forget there are also measures being put through parliament which mean protest is being heavily clamped down on. You're getting in trouble for being angry, and - if you're a person of colour, you're getting criminalised for being angry, even if that anger is justifiable.’
Perhaps women need a cause as uniting as those their mothers and grandmothers marched for. In early 2021, they got one, with the brutal murder of Sarah Everard. The outrage which followed caused hundreds to protest in March this year, and even clash with police on Clapham common after a vigil was stamped down on. Everard’s death proved, in its own perverse way, a great leveller. The fact she was a white middle class woman is relevant. In a still racialised society, Everard easily became the ‘everywoman.’ Her death simultaneously rallied women together and made glaringly apparent how little concern is comparably afforded women of colour.